Secukinumab: A Silver Lining in Dermatology

Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, is a biological agent that targets interleukin-17A. Secukinumab is used in the management of the common dermatological entity - plaque-type psoriasis and its various types, namely psoriatic arthritis, hypertrophic palmoplantar psoriasis and generalized pustular psoriasis. Other less common indications of this popular interleukin -17A inhibitor, secukinumab include ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Familial Mediterranean fever, and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). This review article was written by referring to various review articles, original articles, and some books related to highly regarded databases, such as the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. The keywords explored during review of literature consisted of combinations of the following words: human monoclonal antibody, IL-17A, and biologicals. The authors with this in-depth review hope to explore the working of this versatile biological, Secukinumab, especially as a silver lining in dermatology

Dupilumabe na urticária crônica espontânea refratária ao omalizumabe / Dupilumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria refractory to omalizumab

A urticária é uma lesão cutânea eritematosa, edematosa e pruriginosa, mais prevalente em mulheres entre 30 a 50 anos de idade, sendo classificada em aguda ou crônica. O quadro clínico da urticária crônica espontânea é desencadeado independentemente de estímulos exógenos, podendo ser acompanhado de angioedema em 40% dos casos. O diagnóstico é clínico e a doença pode ser monitorada com escores. O tratamento da urticária crônica espontânea é baseado em anti-histamínicos H1 de segunda geração como primeira linha. A segunda linha se baseia no aumento da dose de anti-histamínicos H1 em até quatro vezes a dose habitual, a terceira linha consiste na associação de imunobiológicos como o omalizumabe, e a quarta linha no uso de ciclosporina. Este relato de caso teve como objetivo analisar a eficácia e segurança do tratamento com dupilumabe na urticária crônica espontânea refratária ao omalizumabe, utilizando os escores de atividade da urticária e o questionário de qualidade de vida em dermatologia. A partir dos resultados obtidos, verificou-se sucesso terapêutico com dupilumabe, que se manteve mesmo após suspensão do medicamento. O uso off label do dupilumabe justificou-se pelo seu mecanismo de ação na fisiopatologia da doença. Este é o primeiro relato de caso brasileiro do uso de dupilumabe para urticária crônica espontânea refratária ao omalizumabe.

Urticaria is an erythematous, edematous, and pruritic skin lesion, most prevalent in women between 30 and 50 years of age, and classified as acute or chronic. The clinical features of spontaneous chronic urticaria are triggered regardless of exogenous stimuli and may be accompanied by angioedema in 40% of cases. The diagnosis is clinical and the disease can be monitored with scores. The first-line treatment of spontaneous chronic urticaria is based on second-generation H1 antihistamines. The second-line treatment is based on increasing the dose of H1 antihistamines by up to four times the standard dose, the third line consists of the association with biologics such as omalizumab, and the fourth line consists of the use of cyclosporine. The present case report aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of dupilumab treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria refractory to omalizumab, quantifying clinical improvement and quality of life using urticaria activity scores and a dermatology quality of life questionnaire, respectively. The results obtained showed therapeutic success with dupilumab, which was maintained even after drug suspension. Offlabel use of dupilumab was justified by its mechanism of action in the pathophysiology of the disease. This is the first Brazilian case report of the use of dupilumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria refractory to omalizumab.

Assessment of procurement, distribution, availability, and utilization of rabies biologicals for postexposure prophylaxis in seven states of India

Background: To achieve the elimination of dog-mediated human rabies by 2030, all bite victims shall have access to life-saving rabies biologicals across the country. The information on procurement, distribution, availability, and utilization of rabies biologicals for postexposure prophylaxis is insufficient. Objectives: The objective of the study is to assess the demand, procurement, distribution, availability, storage, and utilization of rabies biologicals and to appraise the monitoring and reporting of rabies biologicals at all the levels. Methods: A multicentric survey was conducted from July to December 2017 in seven regional representative states across the country. The survey team visited the offices in-charge for logistics of rabies biologicals at the survey states and districts; information was collected using structured pro formas and perusing relevant records. District vaccine stores and health institutions in urban and rural areas were visited to assess the availability and stock-outs of rabies biologicals. Results: Procurement, distribution, and availability of rabies biologicals grossly vary between states, since it is the state subject. In Gujarat, both vaccines and immunoglobulins were available even at the Primary Health Centre level; paradoxically, there was a scarcity of both at the district level in Manipur. Immunoglobulins were used only in nine of the surveyed 27 government health-care facilities (33.3%) and two of the eight private facilities (25%). The cold chain facility for storage of rabies biologicals was satisfactory; however, the monitoring and reporting of rabies biologicals were not complete. Conclusion: The procurement, distribution, availability, and utilization of rabies biologicals were not universal across the states. Frequent shortages of supply have to be improved to attain universal coverage.

Omalizumab and unmet needs in severe asthma and allergic comorbidities in Japanese children

Childhood asthma is one condition within a family of allergic diseases, which includes allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy, among others. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE antibody therapy that was approved in Japan for children with asthma and added to the Japanese pediatric asthma guidelines in 2017. This review highlights the Japanese clinical perspectives in pediatric allergic asthma, and consideration for allergic comorbidities, and reflects on omalizumab clinical trials in progress to present comprehensive future opportunities.

Emerging Endotypes of Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Its Application to Precision Medicine

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease with various underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms which translate to endotypes, in contrast to clinical phenotypes or histological subtypes. Defining endotypes can help clinicians predict disease prognosis, select subjects suitable for a specific therapy, and assess risks for comorbid conditions, including asthma. Therefore, with recent advancement of biologicals in CRS clinical trials, endotyping can be a breakthrough in treating recalcitrant CRS. CRS is caused by dysregulated immunologic responses to external stimuli, which induce various inflammatory mediators from inflammatory cells, including innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and T lymphocytes as well as epithelial cells. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin (IL)-25, and IL-33, which are mainly secreted by epithelial cells in response to external stimuli, act on type 2 ILCs and T helper 2 (Th2) cells, inducing IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Local immunoglobulin E (IgE) production is also a signature event in nasal polyps (NP). These inflammatory mediators are novel potential therapeutic targets for recalcitrant CRS. This article reviews recent publications regarding endotypes and endotype-based therapeutic strategies in CRS and NP.

Guidelines for the management of Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: An Indian perspective.

Background: Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severe, life‑threatening mucocutaneous adverse drug reactions with a high morbidity and mortality that require immediate medical care. The various immunomodulatory treatments include systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis and tumor necrosis factor‑α inhibitors. Aim: The ideal therapy of Stevens– Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis still remains a matter of debate as there are only a limited number of studies of good quality comparing the usefulness of different specific treatments. The aim of this article is to comprehensively review the published medical literature and frame management guidelines suitable in the Indian perspective. Methods: The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL) assigned the task of preparing these guidelines to its special interest group on cutaneous adverse drug reactions. The group performed a comprehensive English language literature search for management options in Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis across multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane) for keywords (alone and in combination) and MeSH items such as “guidelines,” “Stevens–Johnson syndrome,” “toxic epidermal necrolysis,” “corticosteroids,” “intravenous immunoglobulin,” “cyclosporine” and “management.” The available evidence was evaluated using the strength of recommendation taxonomy and graded using a three‑point scale. A draft of clinical recommendations was developed on the best available evidence which was also scrutinized and critically evaluated by the IADVL Academy of Dermatology. Based on the inputs received, this final consensus statement was prepared. Results: A total of 104 articles (meta‑analyses, prospective and retrospective studies, reviews [including chapters in books], previous guidelines [including Indian guidelines of 2006] and case series) were critically evaluated and the evidence thus gathered was used in the preparation of these guidelines. Recommendations: This expert group recommends prompt withdrawal of the culprit drug, meticulous supportive care, and judicious and early (preferably within 72 h) initiation of moderate to high doses of oral or parenteral corticosteroids (prednisolone 1‑2 mg/kg/day or equivalent), tapered rapidly within 7‑10 days. Cyclosporine (3‑5 mg/kg/day) for 10‑14 days may also be used either alone, or in combination with corticosteroids. Owing to the systemic nature of the disease, a multidisciplinary approach in the management of these patients is helpful.

Segurança do uso de terapias biológicas para o tratamento de artrite reumatoide e espondiloartrites / Safe use of biological therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritides

O tratamento das doenças reumáticas autoimunes sofreu uma progressiva melhora ao longo da última metade do século passado, que foi expandida com a contribuição das terapias biológicas ou imunobiológicos. No entanto, há que se atentar para as possibilidades de efeitos indesejáveis advindos da utilização dessa classe de medicações. A Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia (SBR) elaborou um documento, baseado em ampla revisão da literatura, sobre os aspectos relativos à segurança dessa classe de fármacos, mais especificamente no que diz respeito ao tratamento da artrite reumatoide (AR) e das espondiloartrites. Os temas selecionados pelos especialistas participantes, sobre os quais foram estabelecidas considerações quanto à segurança do uso de drogas biológicas, foram: ocorrência de infecções (bacterianas, virais, tuberculose), reações infusionais, reações hematológicas, neurológicas, gastrointestinais, cardiovasculares, ocorrências neoplásicas (neoplasias sólidas e da linhagem hematológica), imunogenicidade, outras ocorrências e reposta vacinal. Optou-se, por motivos didáticos, por se fazer um resumo da avaliação de segurança, de acordo com os tópicos anteriores, por classe de drogas/mecanismo de ação (antagonistas do fator de necrose tumoral, bloqueador da co-estimulação do linfócito T, depletor de linfócito B e bloqueador do receptor de interleucina-6). Em separado, foram tecidas considerações gerais sobre segurança do uso de biológicos na gravidez e na lactação. Esta revisão procura oferecer uma atualização ampla e equilibrada das experiências clínica e experimental acumuladas nas últimas duas décadas de uso de medicamentos imunobiológicos para o tratamento da AR e espondiloartrites.

The treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases has gradually improved over the last half century, which has been expanded with the contribution of biological therapies or immunobiopharmaceuticals. However, we must be alert to the possibilities of undesirable effects from the use of this class of medications. The Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia) produced a document based on a comprehensive literature review on the safety aspects of this class of drugs, specifically with regard to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritides. The themes selected by the participating experts, on which considerations have been established as the safe use of biological drugs, were: occurrence of infections (bacterial, viral, tuberculosis), infusion reactions, hematological, neurological, gastrointestinal and cardiovascular reactions, neoplastic events (solid tumors and hematologic neoplasms), immunogenicity, other occurrences and vaccine response. For didactic reasons, we opted by elaborating a summary of safety assessment in accordance with the previous themes, by drug class/mechanism of action (tumor necrosis factor antagonists, T-cell co-stimulation blockers, B-cell depletors and interleukin-6 receptor blockers). Separately, general considerations on safety in the use of biologicals in pregnancy and lactation were proposed. This review seeks to provide a broad and balanced update of that clinical and experimental experience pooled over the last two decades of use of immunobiological drugs for RA and spondyloarthritides treatment.

Biologics and biosimilars: role in modern pharmacotherapy and importance of pharmacovigilance.

Biologics are highly sensitive large molecules with complex structure, difficult to characterize and reproduce, derived from living cells; used for treatment, diagnosis or prevention of disease. Examples are therapeutic hormones, vaccines, monoclonal antibodies etc. Biologicals are beneficial in the management of several health conditions which were once upon a time difficult to manage like cancer, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes etc. Biosimilars are proteins that are similar to innovator biologics but not the same as they differ slightly in structure however with no clinically significant difference. Biosimilars are not the exact replicas of originator biologic and are therefore not generics. Biosimilars for their approval are not required to undergo intense clinical trials as innovator biologic but are required to produce data that demonstrates its similarity to an original biologic in terms of clinical efficacy and safety. However, manufactures of both the biologics and biosimilars are required to submit pharmacovigilance and risk management plans as part of their application. Marketing authorization for biosimilars was for the first time framed by EMA along with the guidelines for developing them. As biologics and biosimilars are derived proteins they have immunogenic potential and risk of adverse events which cautions their use. Pharmacovigilance is needed to ensure that adverse events are quickly detected, reported and attributed to the correct product and manufacturer. Regulations are implemented to improve identification and traceability of biologics. Automatic substitution should not be permitted for biologicals.

Avanços recentes no emprego de imunobiológicos nas doenças alérgicas / Recent advances in the use of biologicals in allergic diseases

O uso de imunobiológicos, já consagrados como importantes avanços terapêuticos na Reumatologia, para o tratamento de pacientes com doenças autoimunes do tecido conjuntivo, e na Gastroenterologia, no manejo de pacientes com doenças intestinais inflamatórias, inicia uma trajetória também muito promissora no controle mais eficaz de várias condições em Alergia-Imunologia, incluindo asma grave eosinofílica, urticária crônica espontânea, dermatite atópica, e esofagite eosinofílica. É possível que futuramente, tal como na Oncologia, possam ser empregadas várias combinações de drogas visando um melhor controle da alergia, baseado sempre que possível na caracterização dos diversos endótipos e fenótipos estabelecidos. No presente artigo, é feita uma revisão objetiva e atualizada de vários agentes imunobiológicos em Alergia: omalizumabe (anti-IgE), anti-IL-5 (mepolizumabe, reslizumabe e benralizumabe), dupilumabe (anti-subunidade alfa do receptor de IL-4), quilizumabe (anti-receptor M1 prime de membrana da IgE nas células-alvo), anti-TSLP (AMG 157), e lebrikizumabe (anti-IL-13). Futuramente, novos agentes imunoterapêuticos poderão surgir, com potencial de melhorar as atuais estratégias para tratamento das doenças alérgicas mais complexas e graves, de difícil controle...

The use of biologicals, currently recognized as an important therapeutic advance in the fields of rheumatology – in the treatment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue disorders – and gastroenterology – in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease – has also shown promising results in terms of a more effective control of different conditions in the field of allergy and immunology, including severe eosinophilic asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis and eosinophilic esophagitis. Similarly to what has been seen in oncology, it is possible that, in the future, several drug combinations can be used with the aim of better controlling atopic conditions, whenever possible based on the characterization of established endotypes and phenotypes. This article presents an objective, up-to-date review of the use of different biologicals in allergy, namely, omalizumab (anti-IgE), anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab,and benralizumab), dupilumab (anti-alpha subunit of the IL-4 receptor), quilizumab (anti-M1 prime membrane receptor of IgE in target cells), anti-TSLP (AMG 157), and lebrikizumab (anti-IL-13). In the future, other biological agents may be developed, with the potential to improve the treatment strategies currently available for more severe, complex, difficult-to-control allergic diseases...

New Therapeutic Modalities for Asthma: Biologicals from a Practical Point of View / 대한내과학회지

Asthma is a representative allergic disease of chronic airway inflammation. Dyspnea, wheezing, cough, and chest tightness are typical symptoms. Treatment consists of inhaled corticosteroid, beta2 agonist, leukotriene modifiers, and xanthines such as theophylline. Clinical practice guidelines for asthma have been developed since early 1990s. However, there are still many uncontrolled asthma patients with severe refractory symptoms, frequent exacerbations and even mortality. These patients cause high socioeconomic burden but the management of these patients are not well covered by clinical practice guidelines. High-dose steroid, methotrexate, cyclosporine, gold, IVIG, and macrolides have been suggested as therapeutic modalities for refractory asthma but with limited treatment effect and side effects. It is necessary to develop new therapeutic modalities for asthma. Biologicals, or biologics, are a variety of protein-based therapeutics, e.g. antibodies, soluble receptors, recombinant protein-based receptor antagonists and other related structures. New biologicals for the treatment of asthma are being developed. Here I will focus on three biologicals from a practical point of view: a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab), anti-IL5, and TNF-alpha antagonist.

Níveis séricos pré-operatórios dos marcadores CEA e CA19-9 e imunoexpressão tecidual do marcador CA19-9 no carcinoma colorretal: relação com os aspectos morfológicos da neoplasia / Pre-operative sera levels of CEA and CA19-9 and tissular distribution of tumor marker CA19-9 in colorectal carcinoma: correlation with morphological features of neoplasia

OBJETIVO: Comparar os níveis séricos de CA19-9 e CEA e a expressão tecidual do CA19-9 e relacioná-los com os aspectos morfológicos do carcinoma colorretal. MÉTODOS: Quarenta e cinco pacientes com carcinoma colorretal foram operados com coleta de CEA e CA19-9 séricos pré-operatórios. Valores séricos de CEA = 5,0ng/mL e de CA19-9 = 37UI/mL foram considerados aumentados. A avaliação da imunoexpressão do CA19-9 no tecido neoplásico foi realizada por meio de estudo imunoistoquímico com anticorpo monoclonal anti-CA19-9. A intensidade de expressão do CA19-9 no tecido neoplásico foi semiquantificada em leve(+/+++), moderada(++/+++), intensa(+++/+++) e ausente. RESULTADOS: Os valores do CA19-9 sérico foram progressivamente maiores conforme o aumento da expressão do CA19-9 no tecido neoplásico, porém sem significância (p=0,06). O aumento do nível sérico do CA19-9 foi acompanhado de elevação significante (p<0,001) do nível sérico do CEA. O nível sérico do CA19-9, a imunoexpressão tecidual do CA19-9 e o nível sérico do CEA não apresentaram associação significante com características morfológicas do carcinoma colorretal. CONCLUSÃO: As expressões sérica e tissular do CA19-9 demonstraram relação diretamente proporcional entre si, enquanto que os aspectos morfológicos da neoplasia não tiveram influência no CEA e CA19-9 séricos ou na imunoexpressão do CA19-9 tissular.

OBJECTIVE: To compare sera levels of CEA and CA19-9 and tissular expression of the CA19-9 and to correlate these with morphological features of the colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Forty five patients with colorectal carcinoma underwent surgical treatment following measurement of pre-operative levels of CA19-9 and CEA. Sera levels of CEA = 5.0ng/ml and CA19-9 = 37UI were deemed high values. Evaluation of CA19-9 immunoexpression in neoplastic tissue was carried through by means of immunohistochemical study with monoclonal antibody anti-CA19-9. The intensity of expression of CA19-9 in neoplastic areas was semi-quantified in each area of tumor differentiation into mild(+/+++), moderate(++/+++), intense(+++/+++) or absent. RESULTS: Sera CA19-9 values were progressively higher in the presence of elevated CA19-9 immunoexpression in colorectal carcinoma tissue, although not significant (p=0.06). Increased sera CA19-9 levels were found to be associated with significantly elevated (p<0.001) sera CEA levels. Levels of sera CA19-9, tissular immunoexpression of CA19-9 and sera levels of CEA presented no significant association with morphological features of the colorectal carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Sera and tissular levels of the CA19-9 marker exhibited, each other, a directly proportional relationship. The morphological features of the neoplasia had no influence on sera CEA or CA19-9 levels or tissular immunoexpression of CA19-9.